by D. L. Wilson
I’ve found that the concepts used by successful
authors are designed to transform readers into people who are mentally experiencing
their stories. The publishing world calls this transformation, the suspension of disbelief. The reader
must visualize being present as the story unfolds. They must become so
engrossed in the story, that they are living in the scenes as characters in a
movie. Visualizing, feeling, experiencing, being, sensing . . . believing. The
key to achieving this suspension of disbelief is to transform a story concept
into a memorable, engaging reading experience.
A
successful thriller author must create a plot that naturally lends itself to
conflict and tension. This requires mapping out a powerful story line. The
beginning of a thriller novel sets the stage, introduces the characters and creates
a conflict. The body of the novel builds this conflict up to the climax and then
resolves the conflict.
There
are two approaches to mapping out the story line or plot. A detailed outline or
letting your muse guide you. There is no one-way or best method since there are
many authors who will swear by each approach. Some develop a basic premise for
their novel and then let their creative juices allow the words to flow onto the
pages. I’ve found that more thriller writers follow the detailed outline
approach since thrillers involve action, fast pace, high stakes, and a ticking
clock.
Thriller
writer Michael Palmer spends 4-5 months developing a detailed outline of his
stories before he starts the actual writing. His typical outlines are 40-60
pages long.
On
his website, Andrew Gross discusses what it was like working with James
Patterson on the Women’s Murder Club Series and other novels he co-wrote with
Patterson. “To be honest,” he says, “we always began with a concept and an
outline that came from him, which we fleshed out into a detailed
chapter-by-chapter outline. Some chapters longer than in the actual book! No
writer’s block here, the roadmap was always there. Every day, I knew exactly
where I was going.”
I
prefer a detailed outline that I call my “Novel Analysis Form.” I use a Word
Table, which includes columns for Chapter/Scene, Time, Story Line, Point of
View, Characters, Tension/Conflict, Setting, and Comments. For thrillers it is
vital that all scenes contain tension/conflict. Tension/conflict keeps the
readers turning the pages to search for resolution. Foreshadowing is an
effective method to create tension. The transition between scenes is critical
to creating tension. Each scene of a thriller should end with a ticking bomb,
an urgent deadline, a character in jeopardy, a hint of something to come that
grabs the readers by the throat and requires them to turn the page.
I
spend a few months developing my Novel Analysis Form and, during that time, I
also do a lot of research relating to my story concept and settings. The key is
that every scene in a thriller should end with a powerful tension/conflict
situation driving the readers to the next scene to see where the
tension/conflict is headed. The outline is critical to creating a fast pace,
high stakes, ticking clock.
Some
authors complain that an outline would stifle their creativity. I believe the
key is to accept the fact that the analysis form is just an outline and the
final result is the words on the page of the novel. If your creative muse leads
you in a new direction, your outline, like a roadmap, can guide you to your
final destination even if you end up on alternative roads.
---
Image courtesy of Abel Leemans.
---
Image courtesy of Abel Leemans.
David - I really enjoyed your summary of the dual approaches authors use. I find that I tend to bounce back and forth, but I am leaning more to trying your approach, with the built-in structure of the Word table, partly because with several projects going at once, I feel like a spend a lot of time just trying to refresh my memory about what's going on!
ReplyDeleteGreat piece!